Don't forget the long, drawn out "y'all"auntiflo13 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 17, 2021 1:42 pmI'm sick of her repeating the same few words over and over again......like 'you guys.....you guys.....I mean....I mean...I mean'.......
Emily D Baker - Biased Facts AND F**kery Part 1
Forum rules
Please keep in mind - No Homophobic or Racist Posts!
Please keep in mind - No Homophobic or Racist Posts!
-
- Gossiper
- Posts: 800
- Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2019 11:36 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 2 times
- Contact:
Re: Emily D Baker - Biased Facts AND F**kery Part 1
- HiSistersByeSisters
- Informer
- Posts: 465
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2020 5:12 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 6 times
- Contact:
Re: Emily D Baker - Biased Facts AND F**kery Part 1
I've haven't been fucked to even look at her videos lately tbh.
One thing I can say is I get tired of her stans saying how "soothing" her voice is and they want her to do ASMR content.
Subjective of course but her voice sounds like a patronizing 2nd grade teacher to me.
One thing I can say is I get tired of her stans saying how "soothing" her voice is and they want her to do ASMR content.
Subjective of course but her voice sounds like a patronizing 2nd grade teacher to me.
-
- Learner
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Wed May 08, 2019 1:03 pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
- Contact:
Re: Emily D Baker - Biased Facts AND F**kery Part 1
Yall, yall... yyyyyawwwwwwwwwll.Neonlights8 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 18, 2021 3:06 pmDon't forget the long, drawn out "y'all"auntiflo13 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 17, 2021 1:42 pmI'm sick of her repeating the same few words over and over again......like 'you guys.....you guys.....I mean....I mean...I mean'.......
-
- Debater
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Mon May 20, 2019 11:15 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
Re: Emily D Baker - Biased Facts AND F**kery Part 1
This rich lawyer really did say "our thoughts are with you" to people in Texas instead of donating money she got from superchats/ad revenue
- auntiflo13
- Moderator
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2015 4:29 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 19 times
- Contact:
Re: Emily D Baker - Biased Facts AND F**kery Part 1
SageLavender wrote: ↑Fri Feb 19, 2021 3:01 pmThis rich lawyer really did say "our thoughts are with you" to people in Texas instead of donating money she got from superchats/ad revenue
This !!!!
Exactly ! 'Thoughts and prayers' aren't going to get people's water and heat back on ......or supply food to them!
She was too busy talking about her precious car and the thin sheet of ice that covered it......
Stay home, stay safe & keep healthy
- auntiflo13
- Moderator
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2015 4:29 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 19 times
- Contact:
Re: Emily D Baker - Biased Facts AND F**kery Part 1
Emily has been left looking like an idiot....the case for Jurisdiction has been dismissed! ......... I don't think she'll be getting that purple hair anytime soon!
Stay home, stay safe & keep healthy
- HiSistersByeSisters
- Informer
- Posts: 465
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2020 5:12 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 6 times
- Contact:
Re: Emily D Baker - Biased Facts AND F**kery Part 1
There is a thread on BGC that is shitting majorly on Emily. Glad to see people in the comments are waking up. Her 15 minutes of fame is running out it seems.
- HiSistersByeSisters
- Informer
- Posts: 465
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2020 5:12 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 6 times
- Contact:
Re: Emily D Baker - Biased Facts AND F**kery Part 1
Does that mean the whole case is being dismissed or just dismissed from being held in a state?auntiflo13 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 3:43 amEmily has been left looking like an idiot....the case for Jurisdiction has been dismissed! ......... I don't think she'll be getting that purple hair anytime soon!
- auntiflo13
- Moderator
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2015 4:29 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 19 times
- Contact:
Re: Emily D Baker - Biased Facts AND F**kery Part 1
HiSistersByeSisters wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:47 amDoes that mean the whole case is being dismissed or just dismissed from being held in a state?auntiflo13 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 3:43 amEmily has been left looking like an idiot....the case for Jurisdiction has been dismissed! ......... I don't think she'll be getting that purple hair anytime soon!
Just jurisdiction atm - It can be refiled but, will Tati do it again? Uncivil Law has already said it's an extremely weak defamation case. Tati is trying to say that 1. her husband is not a public figure ....2. she's failed to state a claim in the first filing..... 3.is it 'negligent'? (KJ did tonnes of research and came to her own conclusion that JW is an alleged conman - if someone has a few fraud cases filed against them AND opens businesses, only for them to be revoked by the state they're in.... then to an ordinary person, it looks 'dodgy' ) 4. Saltz got two people to say they were put off buying Halo Beauty after KJ's revelations..... not exactly a 'significant' sum
I would love it to be refiled..... I want to know all about the 'successful' companies JW has SOLD!!! ....well, according to Tati lmao!
Stay home, stay safe & keep healthy
- fizzwizz12
- Moderator
- Posts: 6200
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 3:54 pm
- Has thanked: 3080 times
- Been thanked: 2746 times
- Contact:
Re: Emily D Baker - Biased Facts AND F**kery Part 1
haha i agree with you, i'd love to see the proof of all of JW's good business dealings.auntiflo13 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 3:37 amHiSistersByeSisters wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:47 am
Does that mean the whole case is being dismissed or just dismissed from being held in a state?
Just jurisdiction atm - It can be refiled but, will Tati do it again? Uncivil Law has already said it's an extremely weak defamation case. Tati is trying to say that 1. her husband is not a public figure ....2. she's failed to state a claim in the first filing..... 3.is it 'negligent'? (KJ did tonnes of research and came to her own conclusion that JW is an alleged conman - if someone has a few fraud cases filed against them AND opens businesses, only for them to be revoked by the state they're in.... then to an ordinary person, it looks 'dodgy' ) 4. Saltz got two people to say they were put off buying Halo Beauty after KJ's revelations..... not exactly a 'significant' sum
I would love it to be refiled..... I want to know all about the 'successful' companies JW has SOLD!!! ....well, according to Tati lmao!
this was nothing more than deflection so that the real case would be buried and not spoken about. thank goodness we have AuntiFlo keeping us all posted on the good shit.
“I don't care what you are doing, so much as the idiotic way that you are doing it.”-vincent valentine
- Peppa Schmint
- True Gossiper
- Posts: 1215
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2019 8:25 am
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
- Contact:
Re: Emily D Baker - Biased Facts AND F**kery Part 1
Looks like the sub got banned! Shit, they must have really been dragging her for that to happen. I’m glad she’s now looking foolish after saying that this was basically a sure thing for Tati. If Tati’s lawyers were so smart they would’ve filed the lawsuit correctly in the first place.HiSistersByeSisters wrote:There is a thread on BGC that is shitting majorly on Emily. Glad to see people in the comments are waking up. Her 15 minutes of fame is running out it seems.
https://www.BANNED/r/BeautyGuruChatter/ ... ame=iossmf
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Talker
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 2:18 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
Re: Emily D Baker - Biased Facts AND F**kery Part 1
God she is boring. Her videos are suggested to me and I click on the ones with topics I’m interested and it’s just her rambling for 10 mins before she gets to the actual topic.
Also her voice is annoying I have to watch her on x2 speed. She reads documents and has nothing interesting to say. There are so many other interesting law channels!
Also her voice is annoying I have to watch her on x2 speed. She reads documents and has nothing interesting to say. There are so many other interesting law channels!
- whydoicare67
- Gossiper
- Posts: 991
- Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2018 9:21 pm
- Has thanked: 32 times
- Been thanked: 84 times
- Contact:
Re: Emily D Baker - Biased Facts AND F**kery Part 1
I just got a recommendation for an H3 podcast highlight- Her Thirstyness Emily D "Badass" Baker called into the pod after they mentioned her video on the Triller lawsuit. She is so embarrassing.
- Stumpf
- Informer
- Posts: 284
- Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2019 4:37 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 8 times
- Contact:
Re: Emily D Baker - Biased Facts AND F**kery Part 1
I always found it odd that she calls herself the badass lawyer and everyone’s favorite legal commentator… who said she’s everyone’s favorite? There are so many channels that discuss lawsuits. It’s giving “hello fellow kids”
- angriestoftabbies
- Wanderer
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2021 5:08 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 4 times
- Contact:
Re: Emily D Baker - Biased Facts AND F**kery Part 1
I'm about to cancel my membership to her channel because her content is just irritating now. I joined when she first blew up because it was actually a breath of fresh air to have an actual adult talking about stupid beauty guru shit insofar as the law is concerned. I just can't stand the scatteredness of her lives, it's actually the opposite of ASMR to me. I find the constant switching of subjects, tangents, and thanking the superchats in between legal analysis to be anything but soothing. It stresses me the fuck out. I wish she would do more actual content instead of relying on Lives all the time. It's chaotic.
-
- Learner
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 6:47 pm
- Has thanked: 72 times
- Been thanked: 42 times
- Contact:
Re: Emily D Baker - Biased Facts AND F**kery Part 1
I just cancelled myself. I’m embarrassed to say I’ve been a member for many more months than I’d like to admit. I’m ashamed to even say that… but now I’m gone for good. I have unsubscribed and won’t be watching any of her shitty “commentary” videos that she pretends to be an expert on. She was a prosecutor yet she mostly comments on civil lawsuits like she’s an expert on civil law. I bet she sucked as a district attorney too.angriestoftabbies wrote:I'm about to cancel my membership to her channel because her content is just irritating now. I joined when she first blew up because it was actually a breath of fresh air to have an actual adult talking about stupid beauty guru shit insofar as the law is concerned. I just can't stand the scatteredness of her lives, it's actually the opposite of ASMR to me. I find the constant switching of subjects, tangents, and thanking the superchats in between legal analysis to be anything but soothing. It stresses me the fuck out. I wish she would do more actual content instead of relying on Lives all the time. It's chaotic.
Also, I found her difficult to trust. Beginning with her grammar on her website which sells legal stuff for business. See the attached picture of her website… I’ve highlighted the grammatical HORRORS.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- johnny0994
- Gossiper
- Posts: 844
- Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2019 12:05 am
- Has thanked: 41 times
- Been thanked: 1197 times
- Contact:
Re: Emily D Baker - Biased Facts AND F**kery Part 1
I only watch her because she breaks down all the Britney documents in a way thats understandable for me. What does everyone here think about her?