Cloud wrote: ↑Sun Feb 09, 2020 10:20 am
kaysagossiper wrote: ↑Sun Feb 09, 2020 4:55 am
yoyoyo1 wrote:theantiblair wrote: ↑Sat Feb 08, 2020 7:57 am
yoyoyo1 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 07, 2020 10:32 pm
Can anyone explain to me why a 23 year old has a kid? I'm 25 and can't IMAGINE having kids anytime soon. Someone under 25 has no business having kids to be honest, in fact I don't think most people should ever have kids at all.
Why would you want to be stuck home changing diapers all day when you previously had opportunities to do so much more with your life? Just genuinely curious.
This is just so ignorant. Whether or not you want kids has nothing to do with what anyone else should do with their lives. Aspyn is definitely immature and annoying, but why you would make a broad generalization about when people should have children based on your own value system is just asinine. There are all sorts of different people from different cultures with different priorities in life. It would be just as ignorant to say people over 35 have no business having kids. Everyone is entitled to their own path.
And I mean she was just as much of a boring homebody before, even on extravagant vacations she sat in the hotel room wishing she could go home and eat an açaí bowl, so I honestly think “stuck at home changing diapers” works just fine for her.
It's not ignorant, it's just that in this day and age, people ought to be more responsible. Actually, I think Aspyn's an exception because she IS financially stable and planned the pregnancy (I think....) But SO SO SO many pregnancies are unplanned and in this day and age that shouldn't happen. Birth control has virtually a zero percent chance of failing if you use it correctly.
Most people ARE better off building a career and doing other things with their lives. Also, to be honest, if you are over 40 as well, you have no business having kids. It's not ignorance, it's just biology...after 40 there is a much higher risk that the kid is born with complications that can lower quality of life.
Birth control still isn’t easily accessible for a lot of women in a lot of areas and neither is comprehensive sex Ed. Your privilege is showing.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah, maybe for women in very rural areas or in poverty. A typical 20 year old girl has access to internet, most probably has had some type of sex ed in school and probably has a few bucks for condoms. If not, that person shouldn't have sex in the first place. I personally have to agree with the poster above. As an adolescent you are still growing (physically, emotionally) and are probably not ready to have kids and would be better off striving for other things in life at that point.
I do agree that Aspyn is probably "happy" playing house because it wasn't like she was doing anything worthwhile with her life before But having kids to fill an empty void is not something I commend, whether you are financially stable like she is or not. There are so many fucked up children who grow up to be broken adults that I feel like a liscensce fo parenting should be a thing. It's not a coincidence three of four of Sascha's children have mental health issues and unfortunately, I predict a similar situafion for Aspyn's children.
Sex Ed in many states, and even in countries outside of America, is abstinence instead of safe sex. Yes, most people have access to a computer and the means to buy bc or condoms but that doesn’t always mean they can without the risk of problems from family.
It’s literally irrelevant in this case though, Aspyn didn’t accidentally get pregnant, she planned it with her husband! And even so, a baby at 23, planned or not, is absolutely fine. Just because your opinion at 25 is you’re still too young doesn’t mean that is how everyone else should feel.
